Mathew Englander (mathew5000) wrote,
Mathew Englander
mathew5000

The Sun

I saw Alexander Sokurov’s The Sun last night, and still am not quite sure what my view is. Was the film a brilliant investigation into the nature of royalty? Or was it a tedious, failed experiment? I am leaning toward the latter, which is too bad because I’ve been wanting to see this film since I read about it in the TIFF program (I couldn’t see it at TIFF because it conflicted with something else I wanted to see). I enjoyed Sokurov’s Russian Ark a fair bit, and I also saw Moloch at VIFF a while back and I think I liked it but now I only vaguely remember it.

The first hour, The Sun is soporific. I stayed awake, but it is easy to understand how someone could nod off. There is very little light (ironic given the title of the film), and the action appears hazy and dreamlike. I suppose the technique is to force the audience to remind themselves, consciously, to concentrate on the dialogue, but why?

The film is about Emperor Hirohito, in the last days of World War II. The line of emperors in Japan was considered to be divine; essentially, Hirohito was believed by ‘every schoolboy’ (as the film puts it) to be a god, albeit in human form. What I wasn’t really clear about is, did the Japanese mostly believe this to be literally true? Or was it understood to be symbolically true. Sokurov suggests that the populace of Japan, almost in its entirety, believed that Hirohito was literally, in fact, God (or a god?). Personally I find it hard to believe that everyone believed that. However, that issue is not explored in the film.

There are some minor spoilers below the cut, but the film is not plot-driven anyway so I wouldn’t worry about it being ‘spoiled’.

The heart of the film is two scenes where General MacArthur meets with Hirohito. These scenes are the most accessible in the film (partly because the men converse in English) but also left me puzzled. For example, in one exchange Hirohito says that he had believed the American forces would be monsters, because of the devastation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. MacArthur quickly responds, “I didn’t give that order.” It is an odd thing to say, because up until then, MacArthur had been acting as a representative of the United States government, but his reaction to the mention of Hiroshima came across almost as critical of his government’s decision to drop the nuclear bombs. Then, when MacArthur mentions the attack on Pearl Harbor, Hirohito responds: “I didn’t give that order.” I suppose this is one of the “laugh lines” referred to in Michael Sicinski’s review of the film, but I would really like to know the point of this exchange. Is MacArthur supposed to be seen as a hypocrite? Of course I do not object to ambiguity in a film, but I like to think that the ambiguity is intentional, rather than a result of the filmmakers not knowing what they want to say about their subject.

Despite all that, I was never bored during the film. Something about it kept me watching; I never thought about walking out.

After seeing it I read a lot of online reviews of the film. Most were quite positive; for example, it is on the top ten unreleased films list of the blogger Filmbrain. Here are some links:

Long Pauses
The Academic Hack
Toronto Film Fester
Filmbrain
The Sky in Vancouver
IMDb external reviews page

The Vancouver run of The Sun continues until this Tuesday (Feb. 21), three screenings a day, at the Vancouver International Film Centre. When I was there Friday night it was almost empty; there were maybe a dozen people in the audience, if that.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 13 comments